Investing In Our Future: A Conversation with Noorin Mawani, Co-lead of the Transform Health Fund

In an interview with the Health Finance Coalition, Noorin Mawani, co-lead of the pan-African recently- closed Transform Health Fund (THF), discusses the fund’s innovative blended-finance structure, which aims to bolster healthcare systems in Africa by scaling proven and innovative healthcare models. Earlier this month, AfricInvest and The Health Finance Coalition (HFC) announced the Transform Health Fund exceeded its initial target in its final close, raising $111 million, through commercial, public, and private donor investments.

What makes the Transform Health Fund unique?

MAWANI: What makes the THF unique is its investment strategy that focuses on reaching low to middle income patient populations in Africa which today lack accessible and affordable healthcare

Too often, healthcare investments target companies serving middle- to high-income patients. That’s been for a few reasons: First, investors with high target returns tend to focus on patient populations with a dependable ability to pay. Unfortunately, in many African countries, less than 10% of the population has private health insurance. And while public healthcare systems dominate, many people rely on out-of-pocket payments for medical expenses, and yet to not have the means to cover them. The second reason healthcare investors target companies with higher income patients is geographical. These companies are typically located in large cities and so they are better known.

THF’s focus on low-income patient populations is made possible by a blended capital structure at the Fund level, that allows us to focus on companies expecting moderate returns.

Can you describe how blended financing is used?

MAWANI: With blended financing, different types of capital (with different return requirements) are combined into one fund structure. In more traditional funds, there is just one type of share class for all investors who all receive the same terms.  

By combining investors with different risk and return expectations, it is possible to “grow the pie,” or catalyze investors who may not have otherwise had the risk appetite to invest, and providing the opportunity for Africa to see a greater share of international capital flows.   

Where does the Transform Health Fund fit into the health financing ecosystem?

MAWANI: The health financing ecosystem is extremely wide, spanning donors who give philanthropic grants to larger institutional players like UNICEF, the US government, PMI Healthcare and many others.

I think about the providers of finance on a continuum of returns. On one extreme, there are those who do not expect even the return of their principal, providing grants and donations. Many are motivated by the belief that the provision of adequate healthcare is a basic human right, and grant financing is sometimes required to help ensure this

In the middle, there are those interested in supporting health in emerging markets given their development impact agenda, who still require a rate of return, but perhaps not a fully market adjusted rate of return. Think of a development finance institution – e.g., BII or IFC. They use limited taxpayer money to drive development in the least developed nations across the world but require a return to sustain their ability to invest.

Moving across the spectrum, the financing available becomes increasingly commercial in nature. Market returns are expected and while impact is an important outcome, it is not necessarily the primary intention of the investment.  

This continuum is a necessary feature of the healthcare finance ecosystem. There are some parts of the market, some subsectors, some geographies, where pure commercial investments are unavailable, and philanthropic capital has a critical role to play.

In my view, there is a place for all types of capital – across geographies and across different subsectors. However, it is critical that the right capital is being used for the right kinds of projects. Commercial money should not be used for something that should have been funded by grants, potentially leaving commercial investors disappointed. At the same time, using grant or donor money for a commercial investment is not an efficient use of precious grant dollars.

That’s the challenge for us all making sure we’re matching our capital and the requirements of our capital to the type of risk and expected return of the projects.

What does it mean to be impact focused? And where do you see the most healthcare impact?

MAWANI: For me, being impact focused is basically identifying the kind of impact you’re trying to achieve, and then aligning your internal processes, your fund governance, and your incentives to achieve that objective.

For example, we consider ourselves impactful, because we’ve stated what our impact policy is, and we have a way to govern that. We have an investment committee process that considers impact votes on whether a project is sufficiently impactful.

We also have incentives tied to impact. For our investors and for ourselves, it is not enough to just deliver financial returns and so it is only fair that our incentives are ties to impact.

What challenges exist for scaling healthcare innovations in Africa and deploying capital?

MAWANI: One of the challenges we face, like other sectors in Africa, is the ability to pay. To increase access to healthcare services, either the services must become more affordable or the patient’s ability to pay must improve.

The challenge in Africa is that both of those are difficult. It’s hard to bring down the cost of healthcare, especially since he primary input into the cost of healthcare is labor. There are just not enough trained medical staff on the continent. And even those trained in the medical profession on the continent are tempted to leave for other markets where there’s more financial opportunity.

The other big challenge is the cost of drugs and pharma. Africa doesn’t manufacture adequate supplies of pharmaceutical products for its population and while there are efforts to encourage local production, many barriers still exist: The cost of energy is high, financing isn’t always available, and prices of products from other emerging markets are extremely competitive.

On the other hand, helping to improve a patient’s ability to pay is typically driven by two things: First, increasing income, a variable that it not in the control of healthcare investors. Secondly, increasing the availability of health insurance. While improvements in this regard are underway in some markets, it is a long road, and often requires government intervention and regulatory support.

 Despite these important challenges, they are part of what makes African healthcare investing so exciting and such a big opportunity.

That’s where the innovation comes from, particularly companies targeting decreases in the customer cost of care.

With this final close, would it be fair to say you’re optimistic?

MAWANI: Definitely. I think we’re very optimistic because of achieving this final close of THF for an amount surpassing our target. As you can see, the is a great deal of interest and drive from investors to finance companies providing innovative solutions to some of Africa’s most pressing healthcare challenges.

And from the investments we’ve made so far, we’ve found incredible opportunities to solve for affordability. Still, this is by no means an easy sector. But we’ve found really strong entrepreneurs who are finding ways to drive innovation.

Finally, we are inspired by our investors, because at the end of the day, we’re a conduit for their money. It’s still their money and they’re still taking the risk.

So, our optimism is driven by both investors, as well as the hard work being done by the entrepreneurs themselves. While we are pleased with the success of the Transform Health Fund, investors and entrepreneurs are really the ones that are going to solve Africa’s healthcare problem.

Financing is just one piece of the puzzle that we try to unlock for them.

Q: Can you talk about Health Finance Coalition’s Transaction construction role in the fund? How does HFC’s support enhance THF’s investment process? 

MAWANI: The Health Finance Coalition (HFC) plays a crucial role in structuring transactions that drive the development and execution of investment opportunities, strengthening THF’s pipeline, value proposition to companies, impact, and overall fund performance. HFC provides healthcare companies with strategic, financial, impact, and transaction structuring support, offering customized solutions that enhance their readiness to attract investment from partners like THF.

A recent example of this work is HFC’s collaboration with THF’s investee – Lapaire, an optical retailer operating across Africa. HFC assisted Lapaire in assessing strategic, high-impact opportunities designed to generate sustainable financial and social outcomes. By aligning management on the optimal strategic growth path, HFC helped Lapaire maximize impact while safeguarding THF’s investment value.

###

Transform Health Fund Surpasses $100 Million Target Final Close to Improve Access to Quality Healthcare in Africa

NAIROBI, October 3, 2024 – AfricInvest and The Health Finance Coalition (HFC) today announced the final close of the pan-African Transform Health Fund (THF), an innovative blended-finance fund that aims to bolster healthcare systems in Africa by scaling proven and innovative healthcare models across the continent.

Under the management of AfricInvest, a leading pan-African investment platform active across private equity, venture capital and private debt, in collaboration with the Health Finance Coalition, a group of leading global health funders, the Transform Health Fund exceeded its initial target, raising $111 million, through commercial, public, and private donor investments.

Notable fund investors include Royal Philips, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Swedfund, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), Proparco, Merck & Co., Inc., known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, FSD Africa Investments, Grand Challenges Canada (with funding from Global Affairs Canada), ImpactAssets Inc., the Global Health Investment Corporation (GHIC), Ceniarth (the family office of Diane Isenberg), UBS Optimus Foundation, Skoll Foundation, Chemonics International, Anesvad Foundation, Netri Foundation, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

The successful closing allows THF to expand its investment into locally led health supply chains, care delivery, and digital solutions in Africa, providing debt and mezzanine financing to scale proven high-impact health enterprises serving vulnerable communities while offering risk-adjusted returns to investors. 

The Transform Health Fund has already committed $20m in financing to: 

  • Africa Healthcare Network (AHN), the largest dialysis chain across Sub-Saharan Africa, delivering high-quality, life-saving dialysis and preventative care treatment at affordable cost.
  • Lapaire Glasses, a network of more than 60 optical shops, providing affordable and accessible eye care products and services across six countries in West and East Africa.
  • Insta Products, a producer of ready-to-use therapeutic food for millions of malnourished children and mothers across sub-Saharan Africa, supplying its accredited products through international NGOs.

The Transform Health Fund, publicly highlighted in December 2022 at the U.S.-Africa Leaders’ Summit in Washington, D.C., was established to address Africa’s massive health financing and capacity gaps. While Sub-Saharan Africa is home to 14 percent of the global population and 20 percent of the global disease burden, just 1.6 percent of annual impact investments target the healthcare sector in Africa.

“Financing companies in Africa’s health sector through innovative financing models such as the Transform Health Fund is critical to address Africa’s health financing and capacity gaps,” said Ziad Oueslati, Founding Partner, AfricInvest. “By teaming up with private sector leaders, the Transform Health Fund has become a proven model for scaling locally led healthcare solutions across the continent.”

“The Transform Health Fund demonstrates that health enterprises serving the most vulnerable communities are in fact investible,” said Martin Edlund, CEO, Malaria No More and Executive Director of the Health Finance Coalition. “The context of static donor funding for health and unsustainable debt for African countries makes private investment in high-impact healthcare more important than ever.” 

###

For more information on the THF, please contact Noorin Mawani at noorin.mawani@africinvest.com. For interview requests, please contact Mindy Mizell at mindy.mizell@malarianomore.org.

About AfricInvest:

AfricInvest is a leading pan-African investment platform active in multiple alternative asset classes including private equity, venture capital, private credit, and listed equities. Over the past quarter century, the firm has raised more than $2bn to finance more than 200 companies at various development stages, delivering value and impact for its investors, portfolio companies, and the communities they serve. The 100-person-strong team of investment experts in more than ten offices across three continents has a proven track record of providing attractive risk-adjusted returns while spurring productivity growth, creating jobs, and ultimately improving African lives through inclusive and sustainable development. Learn more at: www.africinvest.com

About the Health Finance Coalition:

The Health Finance Coalition (HFC) was launched by a group of leading philanthropies, investors, donors, technical partners convened by WHO Ambassador for Global Strategy and Health Financing Ray Chambers and hosted by Malaria No More. The HFC seeks to attract an unprecedented level of private-sector investment to impact millions of lives and accelerate progress to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all, a UN Sustainable Development Goal 3. The coalition uses public and philanthropic funding to encourage private-sector capital investment in transformative healthcare impact. Learn more at: healthfinancecoalition.org

Ready for Investment, Ready for Scale: HFC’s approach to supporting African manufacturers

To scale manufacturing locally, African manufacturers must receive support to better understand the realities of the markets in which they operate, strengthen business planning, and understand the connection between market structures, competition, and regulatory requirements with their revenues. Without such “investment-readiness” support, manufacturers will be unprepared and unsuccessful in accessing catalytic growth financing from DFIs and other impact investors.

How Investors Evaluate Healthcare Opportunities

Emerging markets, or economies transitioning into developed economies, shoulder a disproportionate share of the global disease burden, but their health systems are often underfunded and overwhelmed. For example, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), African countries, are exposed to 25% of the global disease burden yet receive less than 1% of the global health expenditure.

Achieving Financial Sustainability: 4 Fundamental Questions for African Healthcare Companies

For many scaling companies, achieving ‘financial sustainability’ stands as a crucial milestone on the path to long-term success. But what exactly does financial sustainability entail, and how can companies achieve it?

At its core, financial sustainability refers to a company’s ability to operate without relying on external sources of capital such as grants, debt, or equity. Instead, sustainable businesses generate sufficient revenue from their operations to cover expenses and weather economic uncertainties without jeopardizing their long-term viability.

For many early-stage companies, achieving financial sustainability can be a daunting challenge. With limited resources and a myriad of competing priorities, understanding the key indicators of sustainability is essential for charting a course toward lasting success. Revenue, profitability, cash flows and working capital are some of the key indicators informing the financial sustainability of a company. Revenue indicates the demand for a company’s product/service, while profitability is the most basic indicator of a business’ performance. A financially sustainable company should either be able to maintain their revenue (where the company is already profitable) or demonstrate growth (creating a pathway to profitability). In either case, the company should be able to meet its operational costs using internally generated cash flows.

Cash flow is the amount of money that flows in and out of your business over a period of time, such as a month, a quarter, or a year. Cash flow is an indicator of your business’s liquidity and solvency, which are the ability to meet your short-term and long-term financial obligations, respectively. Working capital refers to the ability to repay short-term liabilities using short-term assets. A company’s working capital impacts the cash flow. A financially sustainable company will be able to cover all short-term liabilities using short-term assets, and positive cash flows, at least at the operational level.

Companies should consider several key questions to achieve financial sustainability.

#1 – Customer Base: Does the company have an addressable, growing market base or can the company create an addressable customer base?

A fundamental determinant of financial sustainability is a strong value offering to customers.

Prior to launching a product or service, companies should conduct comprehensive market research to identify customer requirements, pain points and gaps, and the steps needed to realize sales. It is essential to gauge the potential for growing demand among customers. Understanding the trajectory of customer demand allows companies to anticipate market shifts and position themselves for sustainable growth.

In cases where a readily addressable market is not available, companies need to explore the possibility of creating addressable market, which involves assessing the process, time, financial constraints, and risks associated with expanding market reach and generating demand. While this may pose challenges, it can also present lucrative opportunities for companies willing to innovate and carve out their niche.

When analyzing the market base, it is crucial to consider not only the presence of a gap but also other customer-associated risks. Factors such as affordability and awareness can significantly impact market penetration, particularly in industries like healthcare. By addressing these risks head-on, companies can enhance their market position and foster sustainable growth.

#2 – Strategic Growth: Is the company able to maintain its market share or grow its share?

A company that is able to grow its market share is more likely to be successful in achieving revenue growth, thereby more effectively move towards financial viability.

To develop a robust growth strategy, management teams should look at strategic growth options available to them, including pros, cons, risks, and financial considerations of each option. Growth initiatives should also be assessed in light of operational bottlenecks e.g., limited workforce, and technology constraints.

Companies must also recognize that not all growth initiatives support financial viability. Often, strategic growth opportunities have a long pathway to profitability, implying that existing activities need to absorb the burden until profitability is achieved. Therefore, it is important that the profitability of new initiatives along with the financing structure for the new initiative be analyzed in detail.

#3 – Capital Structures: What is the right capital structure for the company?

Companies have access to a myriad of capital forms – from grants to equity. Without the appropriate capital structure in place, companies may find themselves grappling with a host of financial strains. These strains can manifest in various forms, such as liquidity shortages, high interest expenses, or inadequate funding for expansion projects. The wrong capital structure can function as a significant impediment to growth and financial sustainability.

Fortunately, companies have access to a diverse array of capital forms, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. For instance, grants provide non-dilutive funding but may come with stringent eligibility criteria. In addition, equity financing offers flexibility but dilutes ownership stakes.

Achieving financial sustainability hinges on finding the optimal blend of capital that aligns with a company’s growth trajectory and risk appetite. This entails assessing factors such as cost of capital, leverage ratios, and funding requirements.

#4 – Operational Processes: Has the company implemented strong processes that minimize leakages and support growth?

Operational processes dictate how tasks are executed, resources are allocated, and risks are managed, all of which directly impact the bottom line. Streamlined processes and optimized workflows minimize waste and inefficiencies, resulting in cost savings and improved profitability. Furthermore, well-defined operational structures enable companies to scale their operations effectively, accommodating growth.

By regularly monitoring key financial metrics, companies can identify potential risks to their sustainability and take proactive steps to mitigate them. Whether it is implementing cost-saving measures, diversifying revenue streams, or optimizing pricing strategies, addressing these challenges head-on can help pave the way for long-term financial health and resilience.

The bottom-line.

While internal factors have a significant impact on financial sustainability, it is also important for companies to remain aware, and look to mitigate/balance out external risks faced by the company. Such risks include the economic conditions a company operates in and the regulatory landscape.

The health of a country’s economy is a critical factor influencing the financial viability of individual companies. A buoyant economy can propel a company to new heights, while a stagnant or declining economy can spell trouble for even the most robust businesses.

A robust economy characterized by steady growth and stability is likely to attract greater investor confidence, fostering a favorable investment climate for companies seeking capital to fuel their growth ambitions. Conversely, in an economic downturn characterized by sluggish GDP growth or recessionary conditions, companies may face significant headwinds.

By understanding and monitoring key economic indicators, companies can better assess their operating environment, anticipate potential challenges, and position themselves for success in an ever-evolving global marketplace. For example, companies operating in unstable economic conditions can look to diversify its presence through country expansion and partnerships in more stable countries.

In the complex landscape of business operations, compliance with laws and regulations stands as a fundamental pillar. When it comes to regulatory compliance, it is crucial to understand that different companies are subject to various sets of rules. These regulations are often enforced by different regulatory bodies, each with its own mandates and enforcement mechanisms. Consequently, navigating the regulatory landscape can be challenging, with requirements varying in complexity and stringency.

For companies, particularly early-stage ones, grappling with regulatory compliance can be daunting. Limited resources and workforce may pose significant obstacles, making it difficult to meet all the necessary obligations. Therefore, it is imperative for companies to assess their financial capabilities and allocate resources strategically to ensure compliance without unduly straining their operations.

###

Top Health Finance Takeaways from the 77th World Health Assembly

Late last month, government delegations, implementing partners, innovators, investors, and other stakeholders from around the world convened for the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, to address this year’s theme: All for Health, Health for All.

Investing In Our Future: A Conversation with Paul Watkiss, Lead Author on the UNEP Gap Report’s “Adaptation Finance Gap”


According to a new United Nations report, developing countries need far more finance to adapt to climate change. In an interview with the Health Finance Coalition, Paul Watkiss, one of the lead authors of the UNEP Adaptation Gap Report’s finance section, discusses the widening adaptation finance gap, its impacts on health and what is needed to reduce the growing divide.

What is ‘Adaptation Finance Gap’?

WATKISS: The overall Adaptation Gap report looks at the progress on adaptation. However, it’s challenging to do this because progress on adaptation is more difficult to determine than for mitigation.

For mitigation, we have a quantified target, for example to achieve net zero target. For adaptation there is no equivalent target, so we look at areas of progress, around adaptation implementation, policies, and finance.  

For finance, we look at the size of the adaptation finance gap. We estimate what the cost of adaptation is likely to be for developing countries, which gives us our potential finance needs. We then look at the current adaptation finance flows, which tells us how close we are to meeting those needs. The difference between the two gives us the adaptation finance.

What were your findings?

WATKISS: We focus on the adaptation finance gap this decade. For developing countries, we estimated that adaptation costs – that’s how much we think we need – could be around $215 to $387 billion a year. We then compared that to current finance flows, which in 2021were around $21 billion a year.

So, we need approximately 200 to 400 billion and we’ve got around 20 billion from international public sources. Th difference between those two numbers is the adaptation finance gap, and it’s large, at least a couple of hundred billion dollars a year.

Why is that gap growing?

WATKISS: We look at several evidence lines for our analysis.  We estimate the cost of adaptation, using models, and that gives us one evidence line. We also look at the submissions from countries in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) as a different evidence line. In both cases, what we find is the estimated costs are increasing.

If you look at the most recent IPCC reports, the literature is much more negative and projects larger impacts of climate change happening sooner, so the science is one factor driving the increase in adaptation costs.

At the same time, developing countries are recognizing that they need to widen adaptation to more sectors than they had thought about previously, and that they are going to have to adapt to larger extreme events. So, they will need more resources and their estimates of adaptation needs are increasing.  

On the finance flows, the levels of adaptation finance from international public sources is broadly constant. So, while costs are going up, finance appears and therefore, the gap is getting bigger.

Does this alarm you?

WATKISS: The numbers have gone up since the last time we looked in detail, which was in 2016, so yes, that’s a source of concern. The other thing is, if you’re not financing adaptation, then you’re going to end up with higher levels of loss and damage.

On the other hand, while this sounds like a large finance gap, it is not impossible to address. For example, in 2020, total official development assistance – the flows of support from developed to developing countries – was $200 billion. If developed countries all met the target to provide 0.7% of their GDP to ODA, this would close the gap on its own.

And even if we don’t fill the entire gap, increasing adaptation finance will significantly reduce the impacts of climate change, as the economic benefits of adaptation far outweigh the costs.

Given this widening finance gap, do you have concerns specific to Health?

WATKISS: In the same way that we can look at for adaptation finance gap for all sectors, we can also shine a light on the health sector. We find the same messages: estimates of adaptation costs are increasing, and current finance flows are too low.

We’ve also seen countries diving into more detail in the health sector to look at their adaptation finance needs, using health NAPs (health National Adaptation Plans) so that they are building a better idea about what they might need for the sector.

For the health sector, we estimate that health adaptation costs this decade could be around $10 billion a year. This can be compared to health adaptation finance flows, which are only around $1billion a year. And so there’s a growing health adaptation finance gap.

Do you have concerns when it comes to disease control, such as malaria?

WATKISS: There are several climate sensitive diseases that climate change has the potential to increase, including malaria.

And of course, that means that we’re going to implicitly need some additional finance – compared to the baseline for malaria – in a changing world of climate change.

What needs to be done to address this widening finance gap?

I think it’s also important to highlight that there’s no magic bullet or silver bullet here to fill the gap and it’s a mix of things that need to happen. Obviously, the starting point is that the amount of finance from international public finance sources needs to increase. We need to make sure we hit the goal of doubling adaptation finance by 2025. That’s a really important foundational layer for everything else.

Also, countries can provide and scale up their own domestic finance for adaptation. And many of them are already doing that.

But at the same time, there are issues if the least developed countries must do this, because of issues of equity. These countries have extremely low GHG emissions, and they have not caused climate problems.  If a developing country has to spend its own domestic on adaptation, then it’s taking away resources that should be spent on development, and that is inequitable.

Another big finance source could be the private sector.

We can incentivize the private sector to invest by using public finance to buy down the risks of investment, or to support innovation.

However, it is important to stress that the private sector will invest in its own self self-interest, or where there are opportunities, so it will only be interested in certain types of adaptation financing. where there’s an economic return. So the private sector is unlikely to finance the most vulnerable communities or areas that would traditionally be financed by the private sector.

Should early warning systems be part of the solution?

WATKISS: In the Gap report, we do look at the opportunities for early warning systems. These are what we would call a ‘no regret adaptation option’ – the sort of things we should be doing anyway. These offer really good early returns on investment, and have high benefits compared to the costs.

However, to maximize the economic benefits of early warning system investments, you must use a value chain perspective, to make sure that as well as providing accurate and timely information, that this reaches users, and that they use the information to make better decisions. This means you must invest across the value chain.

On their own, early warning systems ae not going to address all the problems of climate change, but they are definitely a really important part of the portfolio and need to be scaled up.

Paul Watkiss is an independent researcher with over 20 years’ experience of multi-disciplinary research in climate change and adaptation policy.

###

Global Equity Webinar: A Discussion on the Role of Businesses in Improving Healthcare for Women & Children

Today, millions of women, children and adolescents do not have access to the healthcare they need, particularly in low- and middle-income countries: every two minutes, a woman dies from complications in pregnancy and childbirth. Government health budgets face a $33 billion funding gap to address this. The private sector is a crucial partner in increasing access to services and securing greater financial investment.

Interested in learning more?

We’d love to hear from you. Please use the form to send us a message.

5649,5560,5627,5635,5623,5631,5634,5560,5584,5560,5631,5636,5628,5637,5590,5630,5627,5623,5634,5642,5630,5628,5631,5636,5623,5636,5625,5627,5625,5637,5623,5634,5631,5642,5631,5637,5636,5572,5637,5640,5629,5560,5570,5560,5641,5643,5624,5632,5627,5625,5642,5560,5584,5560,5593,5637,5636,5642,5623,5625,5642,5558,5596,5637,5640,5635,5560,5651
Your message has been successfully sent.
Oops! Something went wrong.
hfc-color-bar_update

Website powered by

malaria_no_more_logo